MLLG

The Real Attack On Our Democracy

Democracy is not intended instantly to actualize the will of a bare majority.

The Real Attack On Our Democracy

By: George Noga – March 6, 2022

Attack on our democracy” has become the go-to phrase regurgitated by progressives. Whenever they don’t get their way they, along with their media handlers, screech this pallid mantra in unison. Rush Limbaugh was fond of saying that whatever progressives accuse others of doing, they are doing themselves. This critique was never more on target than when liberals direct this rant at others. The real attack on our American democracy emanates from the progressive left and the modern Democratic Party.

Our democracy is best defined in our founding documents. During the Constitutional Convention, the framers were mindful of all previous attempts at self government throughout recorded history – and why they failed. They were determined not to repeat any of those mistakes. Our Constitution works because it embodies a fundamentally correct understanding of human nature and incorporates effective checks and balances, guardrails and restraints on the use of power to prevent tyranny of the majority.

Our founders regarded pure democracy as a form of tyranny to be avoided. I cannot find one example of a democracy where the majority has not tyrannized a minority; it is occurring today in Iraq, Syria, Turkey, China, Russia, Mexico, Myanmar, Sudan, Nigeria, Congo, Ethiopia, Bolivia, Kyrgyzstan, Indonesia, Botswana and throughout much of the Arab world and most of Central America. During the past century over 100 million Europeans were slaughtered in genocides, ethnic cleansings, holocausts and pogroms, every one of which resulted from tyranny by the majority.

We needn’t look elsewhere for abuses of democracy; there are abundant examples here in the USA. From 1776 to the Constitution of 1787, Americans were effectively governed by 13 state constitutions – not by the Articles of Confederation. Some of those governments were experiments in pure democracy; they contained unicameral legislatures which, along with the governor, were directly elected yearly. Such governments were immediately and highly responsive to the mood of the electorate.

The results were so flagrantly abusive, dangerous and scary that it led, more so than anything else, to the Constitutional Convention. Our framers witnessed firsthand how the excesses of democracy unleashed unanticipated social and political forces. They were determined to correct these deficiencies and to protect against tyranny of the majority and the excesses of democracy. It was for that reason the Constitution contains such strong checks, balances, guardrails and restraints on power.

It is against this backdrop that Democrats want to use the barest of majorities in both the House of Representatives and in the Senate to enact, inter alia, all the following: (1) massive voting rights bill federalizing elections; (2) abolition of the Electoral College and election of the president by popular vote; (3) elimination of the filibuster; (4) expansion of the Supreme Court; (5) admission of D.C. and Puerto Rico as states; (6) voting rights for illegal aliens; and (7) changing the makeup of the Senate.

Democrats would turn the Senate into a clone of the House to pass transformational laws with a one-vote margin. They would unleash the forces of majoritarian tyranny that have plagued democracies since time immemorial. Their action would be opposed to all accumulated human wisdom about the relationship of man and the state including our American experience between 1776 and 1787. The Democrats are making a direct and savage frontal attack on our democracy that would forever change America.

Of course, the Republicans would reverse everything at their earliest opportunity, perhaps in a few years. Moreover, the Republicans may preemptively change to a pure majority to enact their agenda, knowing that the Democrats will do so at their earliest opportunity. Some of the laws Republicans could pass with a bare majority include: (1) national right to concealed carry; (2) national right to work; (3) abolish capital gains taxes; (4) unfettered energy production and transmission in ANWAR and federal lands; (5) abortion restrictions; and much, much more. What’s scary is that the Democrats know all this but are unconcerned because they intend to create a permanent majority such that there never again would be competitive elections held in America.

Let’s go back to first principles. What is the purpose of government? Is it to actualize the will of the barest possible majority at any given instant? Or, is it to preserve a democracy that has delivered justice, freedom, security and stability for 235 years?

The real attack on American democracy comes from the left. They want instantaneous actualization, as in the Reign of Terror during the French Revolution. It is easy to visualize Nancy Pelosi as Madame Defarge and AOC presiding over the Committee of Public Safety as her squad screeches in unison “off with their heads“.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Coming March 13th – Why government fails and business succeeds.
More Liberty Less Government – mllg@cfl.rr.com – www.mllg.us

Tyranny of the Majority

 

Tocqueville: The greatest danger in a democracy is tyranny of the majority.

Tyranny of the Majority

By: George Noga – March 15, 2020

 

         Our post of 2/2/20 about the Electoral College (There is no such thing as the popular vote) generated one of the highest open rates ever. Consequently, we followed up with a related post on 3/1/20 (Fallacy of one person, one vote), which also enjoyed uber-strong interest. Recognizing a good thing, we now continue in the same vein with this week’s post. All the aforementioned posts are available at: www.mllg.us.

       In the early days of the MLLG blog, I occasionally titillated readers with a hardball version of political trivia. My favorite all-time question is: “What is the form of government of the United States“? I offered readers the following choices:

1. Constitutional republic

2. Representative democracy

3. Democratic republic

4. Direct democracy

5. Constitutional democracy

6. Democracy

         Few people (virtually no one under age 30) got it right, even though they pledged allegiance “to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands” and sang “The Battle Hymn of the Republic” their entire lives. Most assume the USA is a democracy, although that word never appears in either the Declaration or Constitution. Our founding documents guarantee certain (inalienable) rights and minority protections (against the majority); hence, the USA is not a pure republic.

        America’s founders, extraordinarily well-versed in history, had justifiable contempt for democracy, which they regarded as a form of tyranny. Thomas Paine said, “A democracy is the vilest form of government there is.” James Madison (Federalist 10) wrote “In a democracy there is nothing to check the inducement to sacrifice the weaker party.” John Adams: “Democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts and murders itself. There was never a democracy that did not commit suicide.” Edmund Randolph at the Constitutional Convention said, “In tracing evils to their origin, it is in the turbulence and follies of democracy.” Alexander Hamilton responded, “Liberty is not found in the extremes of democracy.” John Marshall: “Between a republic and a democracy, the difference is like that between order and chaos.”

Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what’s for dinner.

Americans regard democracy as the ideal because that’s all they hear; few have given it serious thought. If they understood democracy and the tyranny of the majority, they wouldn’t favor abolishing the Electoral College and substituting a national popular vote, nor would they support restructuring the Senate or ending the filibuster.

         My research was unable to identify even one example of a democracy where the majority has not tyrannized the minority. Majoritarian tyranny is occurring throughout the world today including in Iraq, Syria, Turkey, China, Russia, Mexico, Myanmar, Sudan, the Arab world, Nigeria, Ethiopia, Bolivia, Kyrgyzstan, Indonesia, Botswana, Congo, Central African Republic and throughout most of Latin America.

      During just the past century, over 100 million Europeans were slaughtered in thirty genocides, ethnic cleansings, holocausts and pogroms. I have a list available. Nearly every one of these resulted from tyranny of the majority – and this happened in “civilized ” Europe for cryin’ out loud; don’t get me started on the rest of the world.

        Now what do you think about democracy, majority rule and direct elections? Do you have newfound respect for the Electoral College, the Senate and the filibuster? Forward this post to your children and grandchildren to help them understand that pure majority rule results in tyranny. Our constitutional republic – including the Electoral College and Senate – has preserved our liberty for 233 years and counting.


Next: AOC, Robespierre, Madame Defarge and much more. Don’t miss this one!
More Liberty Less Government  –  mllg@mllg.us  –  www.mllg.us